Now with dates confirmed for the week-long meeting, the presidents of national bishops’ conferences will begin to plan their attendance for October’s meeting, after Leo announced it in March.

A recent meeting of the General Secretariat of the Synod finalized October 7 to 14 as the dates, thus falling in line with the regular placement of such meetings or synods in October.

The General Secretariat was the body responsible for organizing the recent Synod on Synodality, and – though no official link was made – January’s extraordinary consistory bore classic signs of the Secretariat’s organizational influence.

Leo has tasked the General Secretariat to “offer organizational and methodological support,” while the Dicastery for Laity, Family and Life has been instructed to bear chief responsibility for preparing the event.

Given the concern expressed by many cardinals over the organizational style of January’s consistory, in which Synod style round table discussions were used to limit the time for free intervention, there are outstanding questions about how October’s meeting will unfold and whether time will be granted to air concerns.

The Vatican has been at pains to point out that the planned meeting between Leo and the bishops is not a synod, but simply an advisory or “consultative meeting.” Outside of Leo’s consistories – in January and upcoming in June – the October meeting will be the first such between a pope and only prelates for many years. The Synod on Synodality’s setup saw the participation of lay people as voting members, and at the time looked likely to be the format used in the future under Pope Francis.

October’s event, however, is a subtle reset back to the normal and proper style of a synod – although it does not claim to be one.

As announced on March 19, Leo has convened the meeting in order to discuss how best to “proclaim the Gospel to families today, in light of Amoris Laetitia” and determine the reality in local churches.

“Our era is marked by rapid changes which make it necessary, even more than ten years ago, to give particular pastoral attention to families, to whom the Lord entrusts the task of participating in the Church’s mission of proclaiming and witnessing to the Gospel,” wrote Leo in announcing the event. He also stated that it was necessary at this particular time “in light of the changes that continue to impact families.”

The meeting marks the 10-year anniversary of the document published by Pope Francis, and which proved to be one of the earliest catalysts for ensuing controversy and doctrinal confusion, due to its passage arguing for the divorced and ‘re-married’ to receive Holy Communion.

Share

Neither in Leo’s announcement, nor in the sparing details which have emerged about the October meeting, was any mention made of the controversy surrounding Amoris Laetitia. Similarly, no mention was made of the many requests to have Amoris formally corrected, especially since one of the Dubia signatories – Cardinal Walter Brandmüller – warned in 2015 that the interpretation of Amoris Laetitia which Francis later approved would be heretical.

Francis declared there was “no other interpretation” of Amoris Laetitia except the one provided by the Argentinian bishops of Buenos Aires allowing Communion for the divorced and remarried, and which he supported. This was then declared – in a June 2017 rescript – to be part of the Church’s magisterium.

It is precisely this silence about the controversy which has led to such interest from Vatican observers in the October conference, and speculation over whether Leo will simply ignore the problems or address them in his classically subtle style. Should the American Pope leave the issue of Holy Communion and Amoris out of the conversation, then it would appear as an severely lost opportunity to rectify the crisis identified by many, and also undermine his aim to unify the Church.

Demonstrating the still prevalent tension surrounding the text, a conglomerate of Catholics issued an open letter to Leo in September urging him to rescind a number of papal texts, including Amoris Laetitia. “We beseech you to annul Pope Francis’s June 5, 2017 rescript, which conferred special magisterial value on the heterodox interpretation of the ambiguities of Amoris laetitia, and clearly reiterate that those who are divorced and civilly remarried and living more uxorio cannot receive sacramental absolution nor, as public sinners, Holy Communion,” read the letter.

The respected American philosopher Edward Feser opined in July about Amoris and Pope Francis that “one could argue that of all his controversial acts, this was the most scandalous.” For Feser, the lines of Amoris represented an attack on Christ’s teaching against divorce. To do this “would thus implicitly either deny Christ’s divinity or, blasphemously, put one’s authority above even His,” Feser warned.

Officials at the Dicastery for Laity, Family and Life have not responded to requests from this correspondent for an interview regarding the October meeting.

According to a detailed new report issued by HRW, the Chinese state is only increasing its persecution of underground Catholics, and is doing so aided by the framework of the 2018 deal between Beijing and the Holy See regarding the appointment of bishops.

“The 2018 Holy See-China agreement on bishops has helped the Chinese government to pressure underground Catholic communities to join the official church,” HRW wrote on April 15.

Having been signed in 2018 on a provisional basis, the secretive Sino-Vatican deal’s specific details remain undisclosed: a peculiar air of mystery surrounds them. It has since been renewed a number of times, most recently in 2024 for a period of four years.

The agreement is believed to recognize the state-approved version of the Catholic Church and allows the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) to appoint bishops. The Pope apparently maintains a veto power although in practice it is the CCP that has control. It also allegedly allows for the removal and replacement of legitimate bishops by CCP-approved bishops.

The secrecy of the text has been one of the oft-raised issues about the entire affair. But its chief author, Cardinal Secretary of State Pietro Parolin has previously defended this aspect, attesting in 2023 that such secrecy was “because it has not yet been finally approved.”

HRW has already urged Pope Leo XIV to repeal the deal, and in releasing their report they have renewed this appeal. “Pope Leo XIV should urgently review the agreement and press Beijing to end the persecution and intimidation of underground churches, clergy, and worshipers.”

According to HRW, the deal has “facilitated repression of Catholics in China.”

One former Chinese resident told HRW that the 2018 Sino-Vatican deal “was used by the Chinese Communist Party as the most intelligent weapon to legally destroy underground churches.”

“In practice,” the anonymous source stated, “they arrested priests and bishops from the underground churches and told them: ‘The Vatican has ordered you to join the Patriotic Association.’”

This has led many Catholic clergy into the dilemma representing that of the days of persecution in the Roman Empire or in Protestant Reformation England: “join the Patriotic Association and betray their faith or refuse to join and lose their livelihood and face arrest.”

The process of “Sinicization” has long been China’s tool to enforce state-control over the practice of religion. Some have sought to defend the concept, including the current Cardinal-archbishop of Hong Kong, Stephen Chow. But, sources interviewed by HRW said that for China “Sinicization” is “about imposing Chinese Communist Party ideology on religious belief.”

Day to day life does not have to entail abduction or torture in order to lead to persecution – although that does happen. An insider who spoke to HRW commented how one priest was prevented from having any banking, phone sim cards or passports, and hence has “no means of survival and can barely make ends meet for even a day or two.”

Share

Pontifical charity Aid to the Church in Need (ACN) has also highlighted how the Sinicization is being utilized to crush non-approved faith especially amongst the young. “All this has led to a de facto ban on all religious practice and education for anyone under 18 years of age in China, thus depriving religious communities of their youth development efforts and posing an existential threat to their future,” ACN reported in the autumn.

This element is something which HRW also documented, with numerous sources attesting that the Chinese government was working hard to control the dissemination of religious education to children, including by stating that parents “must not organize … home-based religious education to instill religious ideas to their children.”

Recent legislation also implements greater state control over the travel of clergy, thus allowing the government to limit international access and any likelihood of whistleblowing. Coming into force this spring, the new rules see clergy and religious having to surrender their passports and travel documents to state officials, any anyone wishing to travel abroad for an “official overseas assignment” must submit a request for the passport and include a document approving the request.

Commenting on this, one China expert interviewed by HRW stated that as a result, “groups must not have any relations with foreign churches or entities because that is seen as a national security issue. The Holy See, and the Catholic Church represents a target [of persecution.]”

Clergy who have resisted China’s efforts to force them into the schismatic, state-approved church have been subject to abductions, forced arrest and indoctrination. Locals are bribed with financial rewards in return for reporting Underground house-churches to the authorities.

Speaking to Bitter Winter an Underground priest attested to the loyalty of Catholics to Rome rather than to Communism: “We endure suffering due to our unwavering loyalty to Rome and the Church and our refusal to submit to bishops who prioritize allegiance to the CCP over fidelity to the Pope.”

Share

Bitter Winter described a renewed crackdown on religious venues last spring as having “reached alarming proportions,” after a series of police raids on Underground Church places of worship led to nearly all of them being closed in spring 2025.

The late Pope Francis and Cdl. Parolin repeatedly and firmly defended the deal, with Parolin doing so as recently as this month. China expert Steven Mosher has previously described the deal as an action which was “perhaps the most controversial of a papacy dogged by controversy.”

Now, according to HRW, “the Chinese government’s rights violations against Catholics contravene the United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights and violate the rights to freedoms of religion and belief, expression, association, and movement, among other rights.”

Nor is HRW alone in its assessment of the Sino-Vatican deal’s impact on the Underground Church and Catholic wishing to be faithful to Rome.

Numerous China experts and Catholic prelates abroad have criticized the deal, and the emeritus bishop of Hong Kong Cardinal Joseph Zen has described the agreement as an “incredible betrayal” of China’s Catholics and accused the Vatican of “selling out” Chinese Catholics.

Indeed, shortly before his demise, the late Cardinal Dominik Duka, O.P. warned that “the Holy See’s unbalanced diplomatic policy towards the Chinese regime can damage the Catholic Church itself.” Duka warned that the “Catholic Church can be perceived as collaborationist, especially if it is true that the text of the agreement remains secret and only troubling information leaks to the public.”

The U.S. Congressional-Executive Commission on China stated its 2020 report that the increased religious persecution witnessed in China was “of an intensity not seen since the Cultural Revolution.” The Commission described the abuse as a direct consequence of the deal, and former U.S. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo notably slated the deal in September 2020, writing that “it’s clear that the Sino-Vatican agreement has not shielded Catholics from the Party’s depredations, to say nothing of the Party’s horrific treatment of Christians, Tibetan Buddhists, Falun Gong devotees, and other religious believers.”

HRW sent a copy of its report to the Vatican and the Chinese government, but has received no comment from either.

The Church’s liturgical life is intimately linked to the practice of the faith, as summarized by the phrase “lex orandi, lex credendi” – the la…

Read more

The crisis in the Church is a much discussed issue, dividing many in terms of how serious they deem it to be. For …

Read more

While Leo was still wrapping up his final greetings to those gathered for the General Audience, the daily press bulletin from the Holy See Press Office announced two new archbishops.

First was the naming of Bishop Anthony…

Read more

Bishop Johan Bonny of the Diocese of Antwerp, published his plans Thursday announcing how he wil…

Read more

Ten years ago on March 19, Pope Francis signed and dated …

Read more

According to a statement from the Holy See Press Office on Saturday, Leo XIV moved …

Read more

Since the February 2 announcement of upcoming episcopal consecrations by the Society of Saint Pius X (SSPX), there…

Read more

“There is no intention from the leadership of the SSPX to separate themselves from Rome,” said Bp. Schneider,…

Read more

On February 28, the Vatican published the amended statutes for the Pontifical Academy for Life (PAV), which had been signed by Pope Leo XIV the previous day. Largely…

Read more

Müller, the prefect emeritus of the Congregation for the Doctri…

Read more

“Most Holy Father, grant the Apostolic Mandate for the episcopal consec…

Read more

In a forthright article published in French on February 22,…

Read more

In a German article published on Saturday morning, …

Read more

The letter from SSPX Superior General Father Pagliarani, sent to Cardinal Victor Manuel Fernández on February …

Read more

On February 12 the high-profile meeting between Cardinal Victor Manuel Fernández, prefect of the Dicastery for the Doctrine of…

Read more

The regulations enacted in December by the state-approved bodies of the church in China – Chinese Catholic Patriotic Association (CCPA) and i…

Read more

“Infanticide” and national “self-destruction” was how Cdl. Burke referred t…

Read more

Part of that mission involves fostering devotion to the Blessed Sacrament through adoration, along with that of the Holy Rosary.

This weekend saw the second iteration of the 40-hours devot…

Read more